Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entrenched player's dilemma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Entrenched player's dilemma

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not satisfy GNG. Perhaps worth a mention in a relevant article, but there is not enough to substantiate a separate article. – DarkGlow • 17:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 17:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete A mention in three books and one paper is not enough to get its own article. Gabe114 (talk) 19:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.