Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entrepreneurial feminism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Clearly no support for deletion here. There are competing merge suggestions and concerns that any of these would lead to the merge target being overwhelmed by this topic; perhaps the merger discussion should be held separately from the AfD. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Entrepreneurial feminism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Content fork of information better served either in the Entrepreneurship article (where it already has a section) or in the Feminism article, where 'Entrepreneurial feminism' is not mentioned once. Readers are unlikely to find this information here, and it does not seem to warrant a standalone article. InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

It seems like all articles related to Feminine capital, feminine entrepreneurship, feminist business, and Barbara Jayne Orser are being targetted by Insertcleverphrasehere. This is very unprofessional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp (talk • contribs) 20:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed, these articles were all recently brought to my attention, by yourself on the AfD for Barbara Jayne Orser. While Barbara Jayne Orser's book might be notable, if only because of a single book review and a couple of news articles that mention it that I found (Which I added to the talk page), the others do not seem to warrant standalone articles.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  21:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

The other articles were reviewed and approved by others, before your kind proposal and now nominations for deletion. Others considered these articles to be valid and reviewed them. You're the only one targeting all related articles for deletion. The topic is new and avant-gardiste, as is much in feminism. This is the next big thing in feminist business and female empowerment. The "feminism" article will be updated, we are drafting content currently to add to the article and to link to the other standalone articles from within and to "feminism." We do appreciate your suggestion that we add to "feminism".

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp (talk • contribs) 21:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * "Next big thing" might be true, or it might not be. In any case it is far WP:TOO SOON to be a standalone article as of the moment.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  21:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

It is not WP:TOO SOON. The topic is being taught at the University of Ottawa, one of Canada's top 15 universities and worldwide top 200. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp (talk • contribs) 21:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep See below; Original comment: I'm seeing sufficient discussions of the term in Google books for this to meet GNG, as perhaps a term to describe the phenomenon, rather than the phenomenon itself. A redirect would be difficult as it's not clear whether this should go to Feminism or Entrepreneurship. In any case, the article should probably be kept and expanded. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social sciences-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Entrepreneurship. There's a little bit of additional information in this article, but that can easily go in the main article.  The topic is noteworthy, but it seems like it fits very well as a subtopic in the place we already have for it. Fieari (talk) 04:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Entrepreneurship is a good solution. The article can be reinstated if somebody would want to work on the topic in more detail. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't think a subject thats being taught at institutions should get deleted. Pwolit iets (talk) 08:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think there is any such criteria in any of the guidelines on notability. Correct me if I am wrong.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  05:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - While a merge isn't crazy, it seems like to do this subject justice in either of the proposed merge targets would make for undue weight there. Both entrepreneurship and feminism are massive topics that don't make for great merge targets when there's sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG. a whole book about it published by Stanford University Press, plays a major role in From Barbie to Mortal Kombat (link is to chapter 1 as republished by NY Times), which was a pretty significant book in media studies -- and, as an aside, I'm surprised we don't have an article on it yet. It's part of this book chapter, also in relation to video games. article in Journal of Business Ethics. some extended coverage in this book. Those are just from the first couple pages of ghits, and I haven't even done a gscholar search yet. The coverage seems sufficiently similar to feminine capital that a merge of the two probably makes sense. My sense is that this is the more flexible term, with that one overlapping too much with the book of the same name. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 19:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.