Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entrespace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 15:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Entrespace

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:ADMASQ article promoting a non notable organization that lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus do not satisfy WP:NCORP. A before search shows a plethora of user generated sources needless to say, WP:ORGDEPTH is definitely absent. Celestina007 (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can only find a Business Wire press release and the usual database profiles. According to some of the profiles, this is a small, recently-started company with 3 employees. There's no claim to notability and none of the sources satisfy WP:NCORP criteria Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete promotional and not close to a Wikipedia article at all. If the company ever grows to a size and influence with independent sources, start from scratch. W Nowicki (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This reeks of promo and utterly fails notability guidelines. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nom and above arguments.  Peter Ormond &#128172;  00:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Deleteinsubstantial RS.Deathlibrarian (talk) 06:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.