Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Entro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NCORP fail ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:22, 9 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete for now, unless better sources can be found. The existing sourcing is completely inadequate for an encyclopedia article. But what we're trying to find out here is if the subject is notable, not if the article is any good. Of all the people connected to Entro, the best known is probably Stuart Ash. That article has many problems, but he is notable. We also have an article on St. Joseph Communications, the parent company of DW+Partners, who first took over Gottschalk+Ash. We don't have an article on DW+Partners, but we do have an article on Don Watt, its founder. I don't think that Kuzyk and McCutcheon are similarly notable, so creating an article about the principals doesn't look like an option. Entro has (acquired) a significant piece of graphic design history in Canada, but unless we can find independent sources about the company itself, the subject is not "notable" per Wikipedia's policy and idiosyncratic use of the term. Try to write an article that is strictly based only on what independent, reliable sources have to say about Entro; with what we have now, that is not feasible. Vexations (talk) 22:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I totally agree with the last delete voter about the notability issues. I couldn't have said it better myself. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's an advert. Dorama285 (talk) 00:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.