Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entry (economics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  20:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Entry (economics)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Two sentence article. (Second sentence is OR.) No refs since creation in 2004. No refs since tagged no ref in 2009. Orphan (2-3 links). Vague term to begin with. Title is not WP:PRECISE. Perhaps https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/entry can be expanded to define. – S. Rich (talk) 17:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete by "not a dictionary." The article doesn't tell us anything about entry, just what the word means in this context and even that's a little vague. Kitfoxxe (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * delete We do not need a one sentence article for an obvious-from-context definition. Mangoe (talk) 18:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.