Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environment One Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 10:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Environment One Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

product catalog for non notable company  DGG ( talk ) 00:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:TNT. Entirely sourced from its own web pages and the SEC filings of its parent company, which is itself notable, but that doesn't necessarily make every acquisition of theirs notable. E/One was only traded on NASDAQ before its acquisition, which doesn't impart a presumption of notability. If someone wants to further research this and prove WP:CORPDEPTH for E/One itself, I'm willing to revisit my opinion. Unfortunately, even the acquisition info is sourced from a press release. Alternatively one could prove that the E/One-branded products (PCP apparently still uses this brand) pass WP:GNG. A quick search in Google Books didn't find anything that might be useful in that direction: I only found some passing mentions of E/One. Someone not using his real name (talk) 01:11, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * delete the article is masquerading as a product catalog with a complete lack of third party sources. LibStar (talk) 12:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.