Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environmental-friendly Production (South Korea)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. As there were no other suggestions on what do with this article, is free to continue to work on this in draft space. – bradv 🍁  23:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Environmental-friendly Production (South Korea)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a very good essay and would make an excellent magazine article, but that is the second problem with it. The first problem is that it carries insufficient referencing to remain here.

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

It has been self moved to main space from WP:AFC, which is something the creating editor is entitled to do. I was in two minds about draftification, something that can turn into move warring, or about AfD to get community consensus one way or the other. AfD won Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 14:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 14:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 14:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 14:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 14:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 14:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Procedural comment: the article has been draftified. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I moved the page back to main space while this AFD is proceeding. That seems to be how these situations have been handled recently. I've seen other subjects of AFD discussions moved to Draft space in the past few months. Liz Read! Talk! 02:17, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * @Liz Fine with me but I do think this invalidates this AfD. Draftify is an AfD outcome, I don't object to it being boldly done, but even the XfD template in the article notes it is in the wrong place (should be at MfD not AfD now). Technicalities, I know, just saying. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:21, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.