Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environmental Robots Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Listed for almost a month with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Environmental Robots Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:54, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gongshow  Talk 14:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Not much online but I found a story in Popular Science (Dan Ferber, "Will artificial muscle make you stronger?" Popular Science, September 2005. pp 82-90.) on Google Books that discusses the company a bit, and a few other references on Google Books, e.g. in Biomimetics: biologically inspired technologies by Yoseph Bar-Cohen.  There's also some stuff about a lawsuit with the University of New Mexico. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I tentatively agree with Colapeninsula. There doesn't appear to be much online coverage, but the coverage Inc.%22 on Google Books appears to be fairly significant. I believe it may be enough for the subject to meet the notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  00:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.