Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environmental Technology Verification (ETV)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy redirect (see below) or nomination withdrawn. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Environmental Technology Verification (ETV)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability and absolutely no evidence of it. (And why on earth do people include the abbreviation in the title?) &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Violation of virtually every wiki-policy there is, straight down to its naming of the article. There are no cites, no notability established, and the text is shorter than the AfD template. --haha169 (talk) 05:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy redirect. I had forgotten that I had seen this before! This is a program of the United States Environmental Protection Agency so I would assume it to be notable. It is just that no-one seems able to write an article about it. The article I have redirected to: Environmental Technology Verification Program was also of very poor quality and had been deleted on very dubious grounds. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.