Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environmental Value Engineering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Environmental Value Engineering

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A non-notable term, it seems. Outside of papers published by the creator it has been used twice, once in an unpublished masters thesis and once in an academic paper. Ironholds (talk) 14:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nja 247 19:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NEO. Drawn Some (talk) 19:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism, and a one-man theory, likely inserted for commercial gain.  Kemosabe, the herd has passed this way!  This analysis methodology combines the late Dr. Howard T. Odum's emergy analysis with traditional value engineering. Environmental Value Engineering accounts for the inputs to built environment alternatives and can be used to compare multiple built environment alternatives over a life cycle consisting of 10 phases: natural resource formation, natural resource exploration and extraction, material production, design, component production, construction (assembly), use, demolition, natural resource recycling (feedback), and disposal. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.