Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environmental fundamentalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 16:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Environmental fundamentalism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This page, posted by an anonymous user, is far from NPOV and is written like an essay. I looked to try and edit it, even down to a stub, but I'm not sure if anything can/should be saved. There is a place for an article on this relatively recently developed concept, but I think deleting this would not preclude that happening. Madmedea 16:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. — Pious7Talk Contribs 18:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per WP:OR and WP:SOAP. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Inherently POV.--Sefringle 07:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete I considered leaving a copy of this as an essay in the anon's user space, but it isn't even helpful as a potential commentary on the environmental articles that the author may be concerned about--it does not address WP concerns in a useful way. It's interesteing, but it doesn't belong here.--Hjal 23:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pious7 and Niffweed17. --pIrish 17:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete POV essay. --Folantin 17:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:SOAP. Smmurphy(Talk) 22:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - essay. Moreschi Request a recording? 10:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.