Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environmental hypocrisy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete per G5. Prolog (talk) 03:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Environmental hypocrisy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

POV-pushing article by WP:Single-purpose account, attempting to synthesise various anecdotes about politicians, celebrities, groups and corporations in the US into a single article about a global topic, with an inflammatory title. In all cases, there is one or more alternative points of view of what the person or group did, so the article can't possibly be written objectively, especially with a title like this. Invitrovanitas (talk) 23:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  —Invitrovanitas (talk) 23:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, nom says it all. Might well be speedy-able as an attack page? - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 23:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Original research for the purpose of POV pushing. Speedy delete if possible. Kuguar03 (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per other commenters. Roscelese (talk) 00:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.