Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environmental vandalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to environmental issue. (non-admin closure) Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Environmental vandalism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:NN and WP:NEO Webley455 (talk) 03:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to environmental issue. Google is sufficient to confirm that the phrase is in use and therefore a plausible search term, but an article under this name would only be a point of view fork. EALacey (talk) 17:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Your logic seems quite reasonable to me. Although I started this AFD I would like to state that my opinion is now in favour of a Redirect as suggested above rather than simple deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Webley455 (talk • contribs) 05:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.