Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enyahs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 10:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Enyahs
This could either be a hoax or a prank, like the Edmargatus article. No citations or references. Tito Pao 18:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete-- unsourced nonsense, looks like a hoax, walks like a hoax, talks like a hoax...probably something soneone made up in school one day. OfficeGirl 21:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Utter fluff. Robovski 05:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and perhaps talk to to the originator. I note that, increasingly, the posting of one dodgy article is taken as justification for a trawl through a contributor's entire back history with a view of AfD-ing everything they've ever initiated. -- Simon Cursitor 08:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. If you show this article to any Filipino, the contents itself would speak for itself; "Lady Etel Buba" alludes to the screen name of local actress Ethel Booba, while "Datu Mejoputiputi" alludes to the brand name of a vinegar (Datu Puti) in the Philippines ("mejoputiputi" reads like "medyo puti-puti" which, translated from Tagalog to English, means "slightly white/pale"). In other words, patent nonsense. In addition, the words "enyahs" and "edmargatus" does not appear, nor is it known, in any text book that refers to Philippine mythology. --- Tito Pao 16:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Patent nonsense specifically excludes hoaxes. Patent nonsense is content that is irredemably incomprehensible, not content that is merely false. Uncle G 21:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom.--Darkprincealain 01:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, so famous that "Enyahs Fajutagana" gets all of 0 ghits. SkierRMH 09:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. The article makes me laugh lol. -- Howard  the   Duck  12:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a hoax, delete speedily. --SunStar Net 12:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.