Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EoCMS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

EoCMS

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is simply being edited by the software's creator, and as such, is completely biased. It seems that this would need to be rewritten to be fixed. DavidWS (talk) 23:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Question. What you've given is an editing issue, not a deletion issue. Is there a deletion reason?-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  00:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * To me, the article appears to be written exactly like an advertisement, and thus would need a rewrite. Also, the software is not notable.  The creator also requested deletion on the talk page.  DavidWS (talk) 00:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I would respond to that by saying that few advertisements contain both pros and cons for the usage of the product. I intend to work further on the page to make it less biased. E.G Interactive (talk) 10:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find any third-party sources to support notability of this unreleased software. The back and forth discussion on the article's talk page easily qualifies for WP:LAME. VG &#x260E; 07:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It's an unreleased content management system and the article in no way asserts its notability. It's also probably worth drawing attention to the discussion on the talk page. Mvjs   Talking  08:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable CMS - article is bordering on being just an advertisment. Pedro : Chat  11:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. It seems Erik, or E.G. Interactive, has revised the article to be...not so biased. I think, now, this article should be given a second chance. I will certainly help in the rewriting of this article if needed. Soren121 (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable software. Somewhat like an advertisement, the only site with info on the site is it's own.  Also, it seems the owner has two accounts (E.G Interactive and erik) and it seems a little like sock puppetry.  Anyway, just wanted to give you my official stance.  DavidWS (talk) 18:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is a mix of an advert and talk of a future product. Phrases like "E.G Interactive plans to..." scream advert to me. Either way, at this time, the software is NN.--Terrillja (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.