Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eontimeoc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Eontimeoc

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

First of all, Wikiedia is not a dictionary, the current contents is unsourced and the only source, I can find, is Urban Dictionary, which has a different definition. Secondly, there's something fishy going on. The original version of the article was a thinly disguised advertisement for an apparently non-notable author (articles about him have previously been deleted per A7 and G11), created by an SPA. I removed the spam and PROD'ed the article. The PROD was contested without explanation by another SPA. Meanwhile, a third SPA has created a couple of suspicious redirect for the same author, which are now being discussed at this RfD. Favonian (talk) 11:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This wasn't created with any intention of it being an encyclopedic article about this concept and there doesn't seem to be any prospect of it being made into one. Cassandra 73 (talk) 21:25, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-existent word / title of of a non-notable sci-fi book.  Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 00:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.