Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epcot International Food & Wine Festival


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Snow Keep. as per - consensus outlines an obvious keep (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 01:20, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Epcot International Food &

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

food festival sourced entirely to the sponsor's website - just short of ADVERT, probably. Not every event at a notable location is notability - as notability is not inherited, lest we have Senior Day at Epcot Center, Armed Services Day at Epcot Center, Gay Day at Epcot Center, or even Senior Skip Day at Epcot Center, the Smith-Jones wedding at Epcot Center, the Suarez' quinceañera at Epcot Center or Goldstein's Bar Mitza at Epcot Center etc. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC) PAGE''' ]] ) 13:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Article as it currently stands needs work and better sourcing, but there are a ton of independent reliable sources:, etc. --Ahecht ( [[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK
 * Keep - this is a major event that spans a long period and earns notable coverage in area and food media. Jllm06 (talk) 15:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep: I reviewed this AfD filed by the nom yesterday, and found a blizzard of high quality, substantive sources (including the Boston Globe, the Washington Post, Rolling Stone magazine, the Associated Press and Newsweek, demonstrating that the nom didn't make the slightest effort to source the article, as WP:BEFORE requires he do before filing an AfD. I checked his contribution history, and found to my shock that in the course of over five hundred edits he made over the last two days, he filed the astonishing number of 51 AfDs, some of them as little as three minutes apart.  This is absurd, and worth taking to AN/I, but in the meantime these AfDs ought to be pulled.   Ravenswing   18:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep for all the reasons given. VMS Mosaic (talk) 22:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.