Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epidermolysis Bullosa Activity and Scarring index (EBDASI)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Epidermolysis Bullosa Activity and Scarring index (EBDASI)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This index was proposed in this paper which has only been cited two times and by the same authors as the original paper. As such it is a long way off meeting the GNG. SmartSE (talk) 17:40, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 22:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This is an exercise in crystal-balling. The method was only published in 2014, and no substantial third-party treatment of it is given in the references. Give the field a few years to evaluate it and try again. (As an aside, this is an interesting instance of camouflaging a lack of relevant references for the actual topic by very thoroughly referencing every peripheral point in the article...) -- Elmidae  (talk) 17:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with analysis that the subject matter could perhaps be encyclopedic someday, but at this point in time it seems a bit too early. It appears as if the article was tagged for multiple issues, but the tag was removed here. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:40, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as simply too soon for improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  03:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.