Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epiphan Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Epiphan Systems

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Normally would CSD G11, but it's repeatedly recreated, even PROD. Should be put to a decision now. mechamind 9  0  05:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems notable to me. Jeremjay  24  ''' 14:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The page was firstly deleted by administrator Fastily because it did not meet Wikipedia guidelines. Fastily then restored the page to my userspace and I fixed the article according to his suggestions and recreated it. Epiphan Systems is notable as its technologies and devices are used in hospitals, on the international space station, amongst other industries. Furthermore, Epiphan Systems is one of the fastest growing companies in Ottawa, Canada. Eurovictor (talk) 08:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's close, but there's only one proper source, which means it fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG Primary criteria: A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization. The other sources are variously reprints of press releases or small mentions ancilliary to the main topic which would be ok if notability was established. I can't find any further sources. Bigger digger (talk) 15:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * There are two paper sources This is from a bi-yearly magazine published by NASA. I also have sources from academic and scientific journals, will add them in the next few days. Eurovictor (talk) 23:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That NASA source mentions the company once and cannot really be construed as in-depth coverage of Epiphan Systems, it is about ultrasound scanning in space. I look forward to seeing the other sources, I hope they'll be enough! Bigger digger (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment I'm not convinced that Epiphan Systems is an appropriate topic. However, I think that their products (e.g., VGA frame grabbers) would be. In such an article, Epiphan Systems could be mentioned. &mdash; HowardBGolden (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.