Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epiphany (christian teenage magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 16:28, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Epiphany (christian teenage magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Magazines are not candidates for speedy deletion, and the prod tag was removed by the author, so here we are for a discussion at Articles for Deletion of Epiphany, a teen-written magazine. The article itself is unsourced, and I was not able to find any reliable independent sources discussing this publication with my own google news search. Can anyone else do any better than I did at sourcing and developing this article? FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:14, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no sources apart from their own website http://www.our-epiphany.org.uk/ clearly not notable as per WP:Notability.  Teapot  george Talk  16:24, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above reasoning, Sadads (talk) 17:24, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Diego Grez  what's up?  17:40, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I hate saying 'per nom', but there's nothing more I can find to say. Peridon (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I decline the SD and PROD'd the article instead. The only reference I can find to this magazine is on the organisation's own website - nothing at reliable independent sites. Unless some such references can be found, I see no evidence that this magazine is notable as Wikipedia defines it --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 20:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I see no evidence of notability, for example that the magazine has a wide circulation. As a quarterly founded last Christmas, it cannot have reached more than its third issue.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom & maybe now SNOW... Skier Dude  ( talk  01:08, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising. Carrite (talk) 05:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 23:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.