Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Episodic Metagames


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:18, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Episodic Metagames
I don't think this is an accepted part of gaming vocabulary, and it seems to be an essay by the authors that has no place in an encyclopedia. jaco ♫ plane 02:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NEO — Preceding unsigned comment added by Librarianofages (talk • contribs)
 * Comment - Sorry that was me, un-coordinated today: Librarianofages 02:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Neologism, barely any Google hits. - Hahnch e  n 02:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; WP:NEO; WP:OR. --Muchness 04:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, OR. Kimchi.sg 04:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism, original research. --Ter e nce Ong 06:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. OR. DarthVad e r 09:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO, WP:OR --[[Image:Flag of India.svg|20px]]Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  ) '' 14:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - NEO, original reserach -Trjn 14:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. J I P  | Talk 16:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete... "emerging"?! Once it has emerged, then we'll keep it. GarrettTalk 21:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. OR -- apparently not neologism, as the term has been around a while -- although the concept has been around longer.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 22:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.