Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epistle to augusta

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was '''No Consensus. I will redirect.'''. Redwolf24 02:24, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Epistle to augusta
this is a POV/OR essay about a poem, not anything like an encyclopedia article Ben-w 00:16, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Lord Byron - Augusta (Poem) is a duplicate of this page, delete it too if the VfD says so. --IByte 00:37, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the entry for Augusta Leigh. I have made mention of the two poems at the bottom of that page for now.  A separate entry could be created for them, but this effort ain't cutting it. Dottore So 03:02, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The article is highly biased, is written in the first person, and cites no sources. It's actually more about the poet, than about the poem.  We already have the ground that this article attempts to cover extensively covered, with far less bias, with no first person, and with cited sources, in both George Gordon Byron, 6th Baron Byron and Augusta Leigh.  There's no content in this article worth retaining.  Plus, the title of the poem is actually Epistle to Augusta.  Delete Lord Byron - Augusta (Poem) as a title not worth redirecting and Redirect Epistle to augusta as per Dottoreso. Uncle G 15:25:51, 2005-08-17 (UTC)


 * Redirect -- D. J. Bracey (talk) [[Image:Flag of California.svg|25px]] 15:31, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.