Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epistolary between Miguel Miramón and Concepción Lombardo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 07:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Epistolary between Miguel Miramón and Concepción Lombardo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This shouldn't be in the English Wikipedia. Please redirect to the french Wikipedia. Thank you. Alvin the Almighty (talk) 08:59, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, these series of letters between Miguel Miramón, general and president of Mexico in 1859, and Concepción Lombardo, Miguel Miramón's wife, are an important series of documents that portray how life was for these two important characters of Mexican history in the XIX century. Additionally, they show how and why Miguel Miramón made certain military and political decisions, as well as his last words to his wife before his death in 1867. These points of view are very important for Mexican history and are only seen in this document so it should be considered relevant in the English Wikipedia. --Psanchez820 (talk) 09:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 15:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 15:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Just because a book isn't in English or isn't about things in the English-speaking world, doesn't mean it can't be an English Wikipedia article.   do you have any more reasons why the page should be deleted? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, one doesn't know what to make of this nomination statement. We don't redirect to foreign language wikis and there isn't a French Wikipedia article. Normally I'd be open to the argument that these letters aren't notable in themselves but without a sensible argument here, I'm going to default to neutral. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep likely and I would've even closed as such but there may be signs this is not solidly notable for an independent article yet, but there's another matter likely, so keep for now perhaps as it seems informative and sourced. SwisterTwister   talk  08:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.