Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epitumomab cituxetan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spellcast (talk) 21:48, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Epitumomab cituxetan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources that establish notability. Seems to exist per WHO catalogue but there are no sources to base an article on. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   —Tim Vickers (talk) 20:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   —Tim Vickers (talk) 18:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all. Without reliable (and available) sources, all appear to fail WP:N. If, at some point, information becomes available, we can re-add the articles. -- MarcoTolo (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all unless the requisite reliable sources can be found to support the article(s). RFerreira (talk) 20:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Monoclonal antibodycruft. We've been through a whole spate of these in the past. JFW | T@lk  21:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.