Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epworth Day School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Epworth Day School

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This started out as a cfd, then moved to a prod since schools don't get cfd'd, but the prod tag was removed and I do not really see a change in the article context from one t the other. I was going to re-add the prod tag, but the template stated if the tag had been removed it should not be replaced, so I elected to bring this here since I feel this article in its current form should get the axe on no notability, referencing, and advertisement grounds. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete not an expert on the school notability guidelines but I don't believe this counts. (Someone better versed in that might prove me wrong here.) I believe the article is essentially spam. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 04:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Also, not an expert on the rules for school inclusion, but this absolutely reads like someone sat down and just copied over text from a new-child pamphlet the school would distribute in the neighborhood it goes on and on about servicing. I'd definitely classify it as an advert...maybe not spam...either way, it's clearly not encyclopedic. Let the axe fall. ocrasaroon (talk) 04:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- OSbornarfcontributionatoration 04:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A preschool? Really? Even a middle school, absent other circumstances, isn't notable. A daycare- very low chance. tedder (talk) 06:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.