Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eqonomize!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Eqonomize!

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 18:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not well known enough to be included, plenty of other programs that are used by far more people do not meet the required standard for an article. (although that program looks pretty nice) BritishWatcher (talk) 19:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article has about 5 lines, then there's a 'see also' part that has one link. Then the only external link is to their home page!! Come on. TopGearFreak   Talk  20:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable software B figura  (talk) 20:29, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no assertion of notability, no reliable sources to be found. Google search brings very few if any reliable results.  Master&amp;  Expert ( Talk ) 22:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.