Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equinox Fitness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Equinox Fitness

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not sure if this is notable as it has received a lot of coverage as shown here, here, here, here and here but nothing actually significant (no notable and in-depth coverage). This has probably received a lot of attention because it's New York although it seems they have been expanding locations. It seems it started expanding to operate hotels now but I'm not seeing anything specifically notable about this so it'd probably be better to move to The Related Companies, the parent company. SwisterTwister  talk  05:36, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - hugely, hugely famous company. I don't know why you couldn't find anything., , , , ,  —Мандичка YO 😜 09:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep As above. A ton of extensive coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * My concern is that I don't think all of those links could be considered significant, notable and in-depth coverage as compared to Gold's Gym or any other company. Some of that coverage is a little promotional/fluff and such. SwisterTwister   talk  22:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I tend to be a deletionist, but this one isn't even close. There's literally hundreds of reliable sources there, and hundreds more reliable sources about most of its subsidiaries. Nwlaw63 (talk) 23:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 22 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  13:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per and these news sources  as well as these book/mag sources  - The sources aren't perfect but notability is there - IMHO the article needs improving not deleting. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.