Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equintium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Equintium

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This game lacks substantial RS coverage. Article has zero refs. Tagged for notability for over 3 years. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 01:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nominator. There has been no edits to it since 2008.  That would be long enough for any RS to have been found.  There simply is none.--MLKLewis (talk) 19:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nominator's assessment of lack of references and notability. The only sites that mention this game seem to be a hodgepodge of blogs and forums as well as the game's site, all of which are unreliable sources. -Most Serene Wikipedian (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete This article has no sources and lacking information about the game. Unlike other game articles this has no pictures and structured weird. Jwjkim (talk) 05:19, 8, February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete All sites which have any description are the main site, and sites that let companies advertise their games. The quality of these sites are not good, either. Everything else is forum discussions or fan groups. Can find no credible sources. SilentVendetta (talk) 04:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.