Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equivilus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Equivilus

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nonsense article. Equivilus is a term the author apparently made up. A Google search only gets the Wikipedia article. Prod contested by author, stating "Equivilus is a very new term..." • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as garbage (and feeble garbage at that). Xxanthippe (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2011 (UTC).
 * Speedy delete. WP:Patent nonsense. -- 202.124.75.166 (talk) 23:44, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.