Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era 1 (Kim Petras)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kim Petras. Per WP:ATD with respect to deletion vs. redirect Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:31, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Era 1 (Kim Petras)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N(E). This entire article is based on a tweet by musician Kim Petras, where she wrote "ERA 1 is complete", referring to a period of time in her discography. Some pop music writters reprinted the tweet, along with some of the songs included in what Petras described as her first era. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete For several reasons but mainly that the sourcing is atrocious, and the subject is unnotable. Clearly as it is, it’s all based on an ambiguous idea rather than reliably verifiable facts. Trillfendi (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's just a loose name for a group of songs, and possibly a promotional tease for a future album. Individual songs within this group already have articles based on reliable coverage that each has received, and those song articles can stand on their own. Even the sources that have referenced the "Era" group, such as the Billboard article already cited, merely use the name as a loose catch-all term. Not a notable entity in its own right. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 23:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: Would a redirect to the artist's main article be appropriate? "Era 1" is already mentioned there, and it has been picked up by several outlets, such as Billboard and Paper. There is not enough notability for a separate article, but it has some coverage and could be a valid search term. I am just curious if a redirect would be a better option than deletion. Aoba47 (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Though I voted to delete above, this commenter makes a good point about possible use of the search term. A redirect to the "2017–present" section at the Kim Petras article would be acceptable if others vote in that fashion. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 22:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the comment. I believe a redirect to Kim_Petras would be better than outright deletion. Aoba47 (talk) 15:31, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fancruft. Nonexistent album.—NØ 19:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.