Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Online


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Era Online

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable MMO. Article created by COI account back in 2006, before it was so heavily frowned upon.

References are poor. The four simply under "external links" are all related to the project so I've ignored them. The ones under "further reading", as follows:


 * 1) PC Gamezone: short, mostly interview, clearly pre-release
 * 2)  RPG Vault Archive: merely a link to an interview, whose link is dead even on archive.org
 * 3) Stratics.com: link dead even on oldest archive.org copy. Bottom of page notes it's a fansite, so probably not reliable
 * 4) RPG Vault Archive: reprint of press release
 * 5) Indews.com: too short to be in-depth, actual domain now totally dead, archive.org copy barely has any info about what it was so can't even say if it was reliable anyway
 * 6) Gamer.no: personal reflection about RPGs in general, Era Online mentioned at the bottom as something the author played. rest of article not captured on archive.org that I can tell
 * 7) Gamer.no: interview with creator (and author of the article), not independent
 * 8) Novinky.cz: unclear from context what kind of site this was, or how reliable. Domain is now a news site; not sure if it's the same publication as it was then.
 * 9) : Content on photobucket is not a reliable source.

I wasn't able to find any other reliable information about the game. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 04:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 04:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 06:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 09:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 01:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.