Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Watch Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Era Watch Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

It exists, but it doesn't appear notable. No coverage could be found through Google searches or Highbeam Research. Fails GNG. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 22:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * However, Edox watches (Era's brand) are notable enough for inclusion based on verifiability and independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, but Edox redirects to Era Watch Company. At any rate, there are no citations in the article, though sources could be found. — GabeMc (talk) 23:17, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.