Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Watch Company (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  →TSU tp* 08:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Era Watch Company
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable or sourced with third sources. Cannot find its significance when googled → TheSpecialUser TalkContributions* 08:42, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment There was no consensus when the previous AfD closed earlier today after being relisted twice. What's the point of nominating it again so soon? Dricherby (talk) 19:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Edox (their brand) seems a more common term. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Close nomination. This is a waste of time. The previous nomination closed today after languishing on AFD for three weeks with two relistings, and no one spoke up to keep or delete. How long are we going to drag this out? •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.