Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erard Oldtimersweb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was dammit, what's Dutch for "delete"? DS 03:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Erard Oldtimersweb
this article is not only a blatant advertisement and non-notable, it's completely incoherent wikipediatrix 04:50, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Is the "tag line" a babelfished translation?  Indium 05:38, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * User:211.245.243.189 keeps removing the AfD notice.... someone pull the plug on this, please. wikipediatrix 06:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I just reverted the removal of the AFD tag again. &spades;DanMS 06:38, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Ditto. I should also say my vote is delete.Reyk 10:32, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I just reverted the tag again, too. How many times now? Indium 07:57, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can it be speedied?  I reverted the latest Afd removal. Dottore So 13:07, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete having just reverted removal of the AfD tag again, I have left a note at the user's talk page. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD?  13:53, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: So "old timer's web" is Dutch now?  Pretty close to patent nonsense, but what's comprehensible is an ad. Geogre 17:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. --ApolloBoy 02:42, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.