Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erdal Gezik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 05:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Erdal Gezik

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject appears to fail the criteria of WP:BIO and and WP:AUTHOR. A Google search provided me with no sources other than pages that identified certain books as books that he authored; however, I was able to find nothing that confirmed any notability for the subject Inks.LWC (talk) 22:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  —Inks.LWC (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  —Inks.LWC (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  —Inks.LWC (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —Inks.LWC (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. Erdal Gezik is a scholar on what are considered to be controversial subjects in the Republic of Turkey. There is no difficulty in finding references in English and Turkish languages. Due to the number of references I suspect that notability as an academic/scholar is likely to be met. This needs to be further investigated before deletion. See, for example, the hits on Google Scholar.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 09:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Weak keep per  Νίψον ανομήματα  .  --Lambiam 11:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep in the hope that some one can add something biographical to this list of publications, one day. Since he is not a person writing in English, I fear that may take a long time, but we should not dispair.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.