Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erdini Qoigyijabu, 11th Panchen Lama

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Move to Erdini Qoigyijabu. Redwolf24 00:26, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Erdini Qoigyijabu, 11th Panchen Lama
Page is mainland Chinese propaganda. Tibet chose someone else as the 11th Panchen Lama, this guy was chosen by communist China.--Biff Dong 00:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy DeleteAs explained above. Having this guy named the 11th Panchen Lama is incorrect and misleading.--Biff Dong 00:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * After reading DS's comments, I would like to change my vote to Merge into Panchen Lama. I don't think he is deserving of a whole page just because mainland China doesn't like the other Panchen and decided to name their own.  --Biff Dong 01:42, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Biff is referring to my comments on his talk page, where I pointed out that even distasteful topics such as government-imposed false lamas can be quite encyclopedic. DS 13:13, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep and remove propaganda. The fact that he is being promoted as the fake lama is notable. We have a page for several pretenders, Lady Jane Grey was a pretender too. The argument for deletion here is based on a controversy that is itself notable and this guy is one of the major figures in it. If I see his name in a newspaper article I want to know he is the fake.--Gorgonzilla 00:31, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The page title itself is propaganda--Biff Dong 00:34, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep but rename as appropriate, Erdini Qoigyijabu, fake 11th Panchen Lama or whatever :) . Kappa 00:35, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename to Erdini Qoigyijabu. DS 00:39, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Who is that?--Biff Dong 00:45, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep and rename per DS. Capitalistroadster 00:46, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be similar to some antipopes of 12th and 15th century where we will not find out the truth until later. Panchen Lama needs to mention both. --Henrygb 00:47, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename as per DS. --Mairi 01:02, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename per DS. -Splash 02:15, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename per DS. Shantavira 11:52, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.