Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erector (Transformers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Autobots. Whether to merge something from the history is up to editors. Despite the somewhat flaccid discussion, editors agree that we do not need to erect a monument in the form of an article to this particular toy.  Sandstein  12:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Erector (Transformers)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD contested by for reason "famous for unfortunate name". Of course, this must still pass GNG.,, FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to List of Autobots. This article attempts to make a GNG claim with the Topless Robot source, but that notability ones comes from being a part of this group. Making into the Transformers Hall of Fame might confer some notability, but I'm unconvinced it's enough to sustain an article on its own. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Hoist (Transformers) and Pipes (Transformers) were both recently deleted although a Redirect to List of Autobots was suggested - by the same rationale, Erector (Transformers) should be deleted as well - Epinoia (talk) 03:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of autobots, either with or without redirect. We have several articles on rather unfortunate names, so this doesn't get a freebie in that respect. See also the Pokemon test, which I think this fails. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 02:19, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my PROD. TTN (talk) 02:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.