Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eretz chess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 01:44, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Eretz chess

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources. Deleteable per Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 23:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, per Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Bubba73 (talk), 00:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable chess variation. ...  disco spinster   talk  01:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. 99.184.128.247 (talk) 01:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources on Google/News/Scholar.  Matt (talk) 02:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bubba73. Several chess variants are covered in books on chess variants while some of the even more notable ones have been covered in more general chess volumes like the Oxford Companion, and even been played in competition. I see no evidence that this variant is among them, and with no sources whatsoever, I strongly suspect this of being unverifiable. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per everyone. Krakatoa (talk) 16:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Hekerui (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW delete. Only ghits are wikipedia, a commercial site selling the game, and a spam site that appears to pick up phrases from wikipedia articles and merge them together to produce junk articles. JulesH (talk) 09:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, in lieu of getting reliable third party sources asserting its notability. I frankly feel there is about a snowball's chance of there even being such things. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 17:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no source, no notability, all the rest is silence. SyG (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.