Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erez Eizenman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Biblio worm  16:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Erez Eizenman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 01:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: He did play for the senior national team in a World Championship several times (possibly meeting Criterion #6), however, it was for Israel. Is there an exact assessment for national teams on what counts as notable? Israel has always been in the middle to low divisions in the world championships and has never been in the top Division. Other than that, he seems to fail the GNG since there doesn't seem to be significant second party coverage on IIHF Division II Group B champions from 2005, the only possible notable team he was on. Yosemiter (talk) 22:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * @Yosemiter Criterion #6 is normally used for people who play at the championship level, so Division II play is not a high enough level for consideration.
 * That's what I assumed, I just couldn't find a direct statement of that. Yosemiter (talk) 03:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Upon further research, if Erez Eizenman is deleted does his brother Alon Eizenman pass the GNG? He played for the Israeli national team (non-notable), a playoff MVP at Penn State while it was still an ACHA team (not listed in the league assessment), is a member of the ACHA Hall of Fame (does not meet #7), and only played professionally in France (had one tryout with Pittsburgh and only 52 professional games in France). There are quite a few articles cited for him, but are they notable enough? Yosemiter (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * There was this Articles for deletion/Alon Eizenman. But I still think Alon isn't notable. Joeykai (talk) 18:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Deadman137 (talk) 23:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. While one could argue that he might meet NHOCKEY#6 - his doing so would only indicate a flaw in the SNG, since I'm not seeing much in the way of sources to meet GNG. Resolute 00:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.