Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eri Suzuki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Eri Suzuki

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another credits dump that pretends to be an article. Stub in JP Wiki. MizukaS (talk) 05:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:ACTOR. -The Gnome (talk) 11:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * What about sources such as this, this, and this, among others? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:45, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Apologies, Narutolovehinata5, but I do not speak Japanese. I still fail to see how the subject's notability can be established on the basis of English-language media. If the case can be made strictly on the basis of Japanese sources, we will have to first accept that they are reliable, e.g. not "fan sites", "gossip mags", etc. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 23:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Two of the sources I mentioned, Da Vinci News, and Mynavi, are considered reliable Japanese sources and are frequently used as a source for anime information in both the Japanese and English Wikipedias. Da Vinci News is also published by Kadokawa Corporation, which isn't into publishing fan sites or gossip from what I heard. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:06, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * @Narutolovehinata5: Kadokawa Shoten publishes manga novels and magazines. Without some serious evidence, I would not consider any of its publications to be a reliable source; my first guess would be "promotional material for the company's product" even if indirectly. Per Bloomberg, Mynavi Corporation operates "an information website primarily for job-placement and educational advancement." We could perhaps use its content for data such as number of movies, titles, etc, in anime articles, but as an overall  reliable source? That would take a bit of convincing. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 15:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 13:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 13:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - Article currently needs to be expanded and be more than a credits dump, but she clearly passes WP:ENT for having main or lead roles in several anime such as Girlish Number, Yuuna and the Haunted Hot Springs, Katana Maidens ~ Toji No Miko, Amanchu!, Dimension W, and Flying Witch, among others. In Flying Witch for example, she is one of the three main characters. Finally, a simple Google search would have showed that she's had plenty of coverage in Japanese sources. next time, when you nominate a Japanese voice actor's article for deletion, before nomination, please make sure to search their Japanese name, and to check at least their ANN page, to see if they are notable after all. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:40, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, several major roles. Can you stop nominating these? Most of them are kept which should indicate to you that you're wasting time. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 20:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, you can have an opinion, but you should know that starting an AFD via Twinkle takes less than 1 minute. Whether or not I'm "wasting" time has nothing to do with you. Seven of my nominations managed to get deleted in the end since I joined, so please be quiet if you're going to be rude. Not to mention that not everyone agrees with you. The first vote was delete, so that already stands to reason that you don't speak for everyone. You may disagree, but please mind your attitude. MizukaS (talk) 02:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of : see Sockpuppet investigations/Sk8erPrince. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Bad faith nomination by a sock who is now indef blocked. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:22, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.