Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Barrak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Eric Barrak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer, does not meet WP:NBOX. Also not notable as an MMA fighter WP:MMANOT. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, Boxer seems to notable. Fights with Eric Esch, Didier Bence and Richard Bryant gives an initial flavor of notability as a known personality. While searching on Google for boxer's name gives an indication of his notability as a boxer. My decision will be keep for this boxer. Itsalleasy (talk) 02:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. It would be different if there were some (any) title fights but even the above are not that notable.  Esch has never fought top tier in MMA and his Boxing titles are minor, and Bence is borderline notable as an amateur boxer only.Peter Rehse (talk) 07:27, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NBOX. Notability is not achieved by fighting notable fighters (WP:NOTINHERITED). Jakejr (talk) 04:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete He doesn't meet WP:NBOX and notability is not inherited. Papaursa (talk) 02:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable as a boxer or MMA fighter. Coverage is routine sports reporting.Mdtemp (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.