Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Berlow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 08:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Eric Berlow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable ecologist.TED lectures do not confer notability. Winged Blades Godric 14:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * KEEP. Several good google news sources on him, including wired. Ted is notable, and highly viewed, as opposed to tedx. Possible also meets PROF he has quite a few hits in scholar and is cited, did not asseess as he also seems to hit GNG clearly.Icewhiz (talk) 18:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. 11.000 cites on GS in a highly cited field passes WP:Prof easily. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC).
 * Keep -- enough hits in Google Books directly discussing his research to convince me of notability: link. The promotional tone needs to be cleaned up, though. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.