Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Casebolt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Yunshui per CSD#A7. (non-admin closure) Everymorning   talk  14:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Eric Casebolt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person appears to meet each of the three criteria listed at WP:BLP1E, so we should not have an article on the individual. His local "patrolman of the year" award is minor enough that I do not consider it a second "event". VQuakr (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - I beg someone to do a speedy delete on this one - this article is only going to be full of undue focus on that stupid pool party video. —Мандичка YO 😜 05:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep notable for multiple events, thus the range of sources dating over 6 years. -- Kendrick7talk 07:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * the number of sources is not the reason for the deletion nomination. WP:BLP1E is the reason your !vote is a non sequitur. VQuakr (talk) 08:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Being patrolman of the year for his town is of dubious notability at best. Being suspended for breaking up a pool party/making millennials cry is hardly notable; WP:NOTNEWS  —Мандичка YO 😜 08:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Again, notable for multiple events. The number of sources is, I agree, immaterial. -- Kendrick7talk 08:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Being town cop of the year is not an event, nor is it even notable (considering probably every town and county awards cop of the year, every single year). It would certainly fail WP:ANYBIO standard. The number of sources IS relevant; please review WP:GNG: the topic must have received significant coverage in reliable sources; the significance of an event or individual is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources. Where is the significant coverage of his amazing cop of the year award? This is a WP:PSEUDO biography in a violation of WP:BLP. —Мандичка YO 😜 08:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: I'm no fan of today's American LEO's, but this is a clear BLP violation. What does the article say? It says he's a cop who won an award and then lost his job. Is that a justifiable keep? No. So, what is it doing? It's memorializing the links. That is not cricket. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.