Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Fancher, Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Chick Bowen 19:35, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Eric Fancher, Jr.
The edit history, the content of the article, and the lack of links seem to indicate that this is a vanity page. A google search for this person reveals nothing. Chaser 05:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:BOLD M1ss1ontomars2k4 05:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. To me, calling oneself "the greatest saxophone player ever" isn't an assertion of notability. (I'll take you on anyday bro!!) Grand  master  ka  05:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are four Google hits for "Eric Fancher" saxophone one of which is this article, one is a Myspace bandpage and the other two appear to be defunct. There is no verifiable evidence that Eric Fancher, Jr. is a saxophone player of any note. Capitalistroadster 06:09, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. DarthVad e r 10:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "the greatest saxophone player ever" *rolls around in laughter*. --[[Image:Flag of India.svg|20px]]Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  ) '' 11:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. I didn't even have to look at the edit history to spot this as obvious vanity. J I P  | Talk 18:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity. Sue Anne 21:16, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and tagged per A7 because the only assertion of notability is patent nonsense. TheProject 18:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.