Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Grant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Eric Grant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested Prod by the author but subject comes no where close to meeting WP:NMMA or WP:GNG. PRehse (talk) 09:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 09:06, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - I have this page watchlisted because I submitted an AfC draft on behalf of the creator, but I must agree with the nomination. the article is fairly well-written, it is not about getting further improvements in the form; see No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability.  Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Reviewers for your constructive input and expertise in advising for Eric Grant’s article.
 * Considering the creator's note below, I tend to think a speedy delete by WP:G7 would be appropriate. If you agree, feel free to nominate. Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Concur Deletion

I have completely read over Notability in context as to how it applies to the overall article and its MMA category.

I also concur that not enough notability exists at this time whereby in due time through career advancement and recognition that notability will arrive naturally.

I appreciate the mention that the article was well written and sharing awareness of how to improve it.

The article will be submitted at a later date with updated notability associated to it once more prominence in Eric’s fighting career has evolved.

Kind regards, Etagmma (talk) 00:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)etagmma
 * Delete per nom. The subject is one of many competitive martial artists with nothing more than routine coverage. Fails WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 08:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Routine sports coverage fails to meet WP:GNG and no top tier fights means he doesn't meet WP:NMMA. The biggest thing on his resume is a minor organization's amateur title that he won by forfeit when the other fighter didn't show up. Papaursa (talk) 23:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.