Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Hysen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Eric Hysen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Not a notable position by any means and clearly copy-and-pasted from somewhere else. KidAd •  SPEAK  03:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Chief information officer of a government department is not an "inherently" notable role for the purposes of guaranteeing a Wikipedia article, and the references are not notability-supporting reliable sources for the purposes of getting him over WP:GNG instead. Bearcat (talk) 15:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not everyone who has "chief" in their name is notable. The sourcing is just not enough to show notability, nor is there enough coverage otherwise.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.