Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Justin Toth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Max Semenik (talk) 07:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Eric Justin Toth

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It's a dumb article and serves no purpose but as an advertisement for the FBI. There is nothing notiable about this guy that deserves such an article. If someone wants to add his name to an article about teh FBIs top 10 list, fine. But I do not believe that he deserves an individual article since the crime he supposedly commited is not notiable or unusual. Albert14nx05y (talk) 20:39, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep This page is of a person on the FBI 10 most wanted list. If you do a Google search of him you get 13,000 results.
 * He has been on CNN, FOX, ABC, NBC, NY times, LA Time and even in the British, Mexican and Russian news. He is internationally notable.
 * He has been on America's Most Wanted 3 times. So his crime is notable enough to make the 10 most wanted list and to be on America Most wanted separate from the FBI list. I also suspect that Albert14nx05y may has a WP:COI.  His account was created at 15:28 on 10 April 2012, just to nominate this page for deletion.
 * I will admit the article is brand new, so it is short on information and needed more sources, but it it should clearly be keeped.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 20:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I came across the article by seeing a news article today about this guy and I googled him and saw this article. I just think it's dumb to have an article about this guy. His crime is a run-of-the-mill child porn case. There are millions of them out there every day. Its not like he robbed a bunch of banks or blew stuff up. The guy is only known for this one thing. He's not a famous person who then committed a crime. He's just a regular dude who got accused of some minor porn crime. That is why I do not believe he deserves an entire page or article about him. That is why I suggest that this info be somehow merged or put in the article about the Top Ten or something. I made the account today because making an account is the only way to nominate something for deletion. I've been editing for a while now just using my IP w/o an account simply because I did not want to bother with it. But this is why i thought the article shoudl be deleted.Albert14nx05y (talk) 02:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep He's on the list, that means naturally a heading on him on the main FBI list would naturally give him an article to list more about the subject. No questionable sourcing at all that I see, and I'm sorry, taking graphic pictures of children and being a teacher at one of Washington's most notable schools is pretty damned notorious and sick. Finally, 'it's a dumb article' isn't a proper nomination rationale.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep FBI 10 most wanted is highly notable. Remember, the rule about "persons dont get articles if they are only notable for one thing" only applies if the one thing is not particularly notable. His alleged crimes may or may not be notable enough, esp if it turns out he's innocent, but getting on the list, and on TV, is. is that fair? not for us to say.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * delete Why, yes. I am Eric Toth, and I am hiding from the FBI.  But I like Wikipedia soo much that I just have to stay on it.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.