Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric K. Adae


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. RL0919 (talk) 21:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Eric K. Adae

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The person does not meet WP:NPROF. My WP:BEFORE has not uncovered SIGCOV. Lightburst (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Iowa.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  22:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. His GS profile is with only a handful of citations; certainly fails WP:PROF. Needs a check of his books for reviews. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. It should be noted that much of the language of this article can be found at Draft:Eric Kwame Adae, which was rejected due to lack of notability and also an WP:AUTOBIO. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete a clear case of WP:TOOEARLY, the citation count only goes back to 2021 and he is an assistant professor with an h-index of 4. No hits in JSTOR of any reviews of his books. --hroest 18:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, no pass of WP:PROF or any other notability criterion. Local awards do not rise to the level of notability. Despite his Ghanaian origin, as an academic at a US institution I don't think there is any likely issue with Systemic bias in this case, but even if there were we would still need some evidence of notability beyond what we have here. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.