Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric K. Little


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__.  Malinaccier ( talk ) 14:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Eric K. Little

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I tagged this for speedy deletion as an attack page, which was declined. Nevertheless it is not evident to me that the subject is really notable, and the purpose of the article appears to me to be to memorialise his misconduct. Mccapra (talk) 23:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America. Mccapra (talk) 23:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sexual assault in the United States military: Seems to be the logical redirect, there is some coverage, but it's more about the scandal than the person here. Oaktree b (talk) 23:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois and Washington, D.C..  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG. A US Major general removed due to sexism is significant. Mztourist (talk) 03:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * This article was added with the intent that it demonstrates the issues that have come with US military confronting systemic issues that are prevalent within their ranks. Skuzbucket (talk) 07:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks to the article creator for this explanation. Please see WP:RGW. We don’t create biographies of living people to highlight broader issues. An article on the broader issue would be absolutely fine, but personalising it isn’t what we’re here for. Mccapra (talk) 08:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly satisfies WP:GNG. Not just an attack page, as he is a general and therefore plenty has been written about him. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep US generals are not inherently notable, and this comes close to notability for a single event, but coverage like this and, to a lesser extent, these  reinforces that he was likely marginally notable before his firing. The article is far from an attack page and does a good job of maintaining NPOV.  Toadspike   [Talk]  09:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.