Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Kupper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 17:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Eric Kupper

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete this unreferenced BLP article please. This article has been tagged as BLP unreferenced since May 2009 and someone keeps re-introducing the same unsourced material over and over again. While I'm trying to assume good faith, I do have reason to suspect a WP:COI going on here. Google News did reveal a whopping 3 hits for this person but nothing of substance at all. Not even close. JBsupreme (talk) 07:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. You're searching the wrong database; a Billboard magazine search returns 109 hits dating back to 1993.  Kupper is referred to variously as a "young Turk" and a "studio heavy".  I am sure there is something enough in there to source a stub-class encyclopedia entry.  Edward Vielmetti (talk) 07:52, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have just added some sources.  Please review. Echillwp  (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. As well as all the Billboard coverage, he has a section devoted to him in the Rough Guides book House:The Rough Guide . The list of artists that he has recorded with, produced, or remixed is also impressive. I would suggest that this version of the article is restored, and an effort made to source what appears to be a completely true but unsourced version, rather than judging the article based on its current contents.--Michig (talk) 07:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.